When the British Empire declared war against the Kingdom of Zululand in January 1879, many believed the war was a foregone conclusion. At the time Britain controlled the largest empire the world had ever seen and they were facing an enemy primarily equipped with primitive weaponry: mainly spears and shields. A swift British victory seemed likely.
Yet things soon went terribly wrong. On 22 January 1879 a small British force stationed next to a hill called Isandlwana found themselves opposed by some 20,000 Zulu warriors, well-versed in the art of war and under orders to show no mercy. What followed was a bloodbath.
Here are ten facts about the Battle of Isandlwana.
1. Lord Chelmsford invaded Zululand with a British army on 11 January
The invasion came after Cetshwayo, the king of the Zulu Kingdom, did not reply to a British ultimatum that demanded (among other things) he disband his 35,000-strong army.
Chelmsford thus led a 12,000-strong army into Zululand, despite having received no authorisation from Parliament.
2. Chelmsford made a fundamental tactical error
Confident that his modernised army could easily quash Cetshwayo’s technologically inferior forces, Chelmsford was more worried that the Zulus would avoid fighting him on the open field. He therefore divided his forces, leading the majority of his army towards where he believed he would find the main Zulu army.
3. 1,300 men were left to defend Isandlwana…
Half of this number were from native contingents; the other half were from British battalions. Chelmsford placed these men under the command of Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Pulleine.
4. …but the camp was not suited for defence
Believing the Zulus were too inept and backward to attack the camp, Chelmsford and his staff had decided not to erect any substantial defences for Isandlwana, not even a defensive circle of wagons. Such contempt for their enemy by the British high command soon came back to haunt them.
5. The Zulus then sprung their trap
At around 11am on 22 January a British Native Horse contingent discovered some 20,000 Zulus hidden in a valley within seven miles of the lightly-defended British camp. The Zulus had completely outmanoeuvred their foe.
6. The British battalions resisted a long time…
Despite the limited defences, the British soldiers – equipped with the powerful Martini-Henry rifle – stood their ground for over an hour, firing volley after volley of bullets into the approaching Zulus until their ammunition ran low.
7. …but the Zulus ultimately overwhelmed the British camp
Only a part of the Zulu army was attacking the British camp head on. At the same time, another Zulu force was outflanking the British right wing. After this separate Zulu force had successfully outmanoeuvred the British, Pulleine and his men found themselves attacked on multiple sides. Casualties began to mount rapidly.
8. It was the worst defeat ever suffered by a modern army against a technologically inferior indigenous force
By the end of the day, over 1,000 British redcoats lay dead on the slope of Isandlwana – Cetshwayo having ordered his warriors to show them no mercy. It did not come without cost, however, as the Zulus lost somewhere between 1,000 and 2,500 men.
Today memorials commemorating the fallen on both sides are visible at the site of the battlefield, beneath Isandlwana Hill.
9. An attempt was made to save the Colour
The story goes that two Lieutenants – Nevill Coghill and Teignmouth Melville – attempted to save the Queen’s Colour of the 1st Battalion 24th Regiment. As they were trying to cross the Buffalo River, however, Coghill lost the Colour in the current. It would be discovered ten days later further downstream and now hangs in Brecon Cathedral.
As for Coghill and Melville, battered and bruised they reached the far bank of the Buffalo River where they made their final stand. Both were posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross for their actions and their heroic tale reached mythic proportions back home, resulting in it being relayed in various paintings and artwork.
10. Contemporary British Imperialist poetry described the disaster as the British Thermopylae
Paintings, poetry and newspaper reports all emphasised the valiant British soldier fighting to the end in their desire to show Imperial heroism at the battle (the 19th century was a time when Imperialist thinking was very visible within British society).
Albert Bencke’s poem, for example, highlighted the deaths of the soldiers stating,
‘Death they could not but foreknow
Yet to save their country’s honour
Died, their faces to the foe.
Yea so long a time may be
Purest glory shall illumine
The official portrayal of this defeat in Britain thus attempted to glorify the disaster with tales of heroism and valour.